Loading…
The evidential case, examined the way a sceptic would examine it.
Anyone investigating Christianity, and any Christian who has never checked.
You will know what the evidence actually establishes, what it does not, and where the honest limits are.
Roman historians, Jewish records and archaeology that corroborate the Gospel accounts — the evidence for Jesus of Nazareth that does not come from Christians.
The nature, structure, origin and authority of Scripture — what the Bible claims about itself, how it is put together, and why those claims hold up under scrutiny.
What manuscript variants actually are, why 400,000 of them is a good sign rather than a bad one, and how scholars decide what the original said.
How the canon was actually formed, what was excluded and on what grounds, and why the "Constantine chose the books" story fails on the documentary evidence.
The historical case for the resurrection using only facts sceptical scholars concede — the minimal facts method, the alternative explanations, and why each of them fails.
The kalām cosmological argument, fine-tuning and contingency — stated as premises, defended step by step, with the standard objections answered.
David Hume's argument against miracles, why it is circular, what would count as evidence, and the documented modern cases worth knowing about.
Why doubt is not the opposite of faith, the different kinds and what each requires, and a practical path through a season when you are not sure you believe.