About Harvest

For too long, deep knowledge of the Christian faith has been locked inside theology schools. The average believer attends church, reads their Bible and loves God — and has no framework for answering hard questions about history, doctrine, other religions or the reliability of Scripture.

When challenged by a Muslim colleague, a sceptical friend or a family member who has drifted, many Christians feel underprepared. Not because they lack faith, but because nobody ever taught them. Harvest exists to close that gap.

Peter’s instruction is addressed to every believer, not to a professional class: be ready to give a reason for the hope that is in you — with gentleness and respect (1 Peter 3:15). Both halves of that are the assignment.

Every article carries the same structure: a summary you could repeat from memory, the key Scriptures, the teachers being drawn on, the argument in full, the objections you will actually meet with answers, further reading, and concrete things to go and do. Where a video adds something the text cannot, it is embedded — and every video link has been checked against YouTube.

Christians disagree, sometimes sharply, about real things. Harvest sorts doctrine into three levels and treats them differently.

• First-order — the deity of Christ, the Trinity, the bodily resurrection, salvation by grace through faith, the authority of Scripture. We state these as true.
• Second-order — baptism, church government, communion, spiritual gifts, election and free will, the millennium, the age of the earth. We present the main positions in the form their advocates would recognise, and we say plainly that faithful Christians hold each.
• Third-order — worship style, translation preference, the timing of the rapture. Not worth an argument, and we do not have one.

Where Scripture does not settle a question — what happens to those who never heard, the precise nature of hell, how sovereignty and freedom fit together — we say that, rather than manufacturing certainty. An honest “we are not told” is more useful than a confident guess.

Our stated benchmark is a documented track record and a life that confirms it. That standard is worthless if it is applied only to strangers. So we neither erase people nor pretend the record is clean: an argument can stand on its own merits while the person who made it cannot be commended as an example. Where you would be embarrassed to be caught quoting someone, we would rather you knew why in advance.

• Harvest is not a church. We do not replace the local assembly; we serve it.
• We are not aligned with a single denomination. We draw across traditions and say when a position is a tradition’s rather than Scripture’s.
• We are not a debate platform. The purpose is equipping, not winning.
• We are not a substitute for reading the Bible yourself, or for the Holy Spirit.
• We are not infallible. Where we are wrong, we want to be corrected — from Scripture.

If you find an error — a misquoted verse, a misattributed idea, a date that is wrong, a position stated unfairly — we want to know. Accuracy is not a nice-to-have on a site whose entire purpose is equipping people to speak with confidence. A claim we cannot support should be removed, not softened.

Every article ends with a Report it link that opens the form with the page already filled in. For anything else — a question for a person rather than the AI, a topic we should cover, or a word of encouragement — use the same form.

Report an error or send feedback

Or email [email protected].